Q: Looking at the regulation for AERs, there is no specific information about how much of a gap can be between the last evaluation for NCOs and the beginning of the report (AER). For AKO Addresses you do NOT enter the last portion of the e-mail address (after the sign) but for all other e-mail addresses you do. Also, the example shows the entire e-mail address when the unit or personal e-mail is used. It is only an option when an AKO e-mail address is not available. Does this mean that there is an option?Ī: NO!! The example in the MILPER Message was shown for format purposes in those instances when a AKO e-mail address is simply not available and the rating official must use a unit e-mail address or even a personal e-mail address. Q: The example in MILPER Message 02-114 shows a unit e-mail address for an active duty officer (the senior rater). The 3d line is specifically reserved for e-mail addresses. The rater should choose which areas are the most important that will fit on the two lines. Q: What should I do if Part IIId is filled with special emphasis data and there is no room for the e-mail addresses?Ī: In light of the new requirement to add the e-mail addresses on the 3d line of Part IIId, raters need to know and understand that they have two lines available to enter areas of special emphasis. Reports for USAR/AGR and NG personnel are not processed at EREC so the requirement to enter the AKO e-mail addresses do not apply to those reports Q: Does the recent requirement to enter the AKO e-mail address apply only to reports on active Army personnel?Ī: YES.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |